Disclaimer: I’m going to break a ground rule even before I’ve committed to a formal blog-constitution. Just this time, I will talk about politics
defined as: ‘Social relations involving intrigue to gain authority or power’
A 29 year old poet politican has been in the news lately. By definition, he would seem like a keen student of his chosen profession except that he’s not.
He’s an opportunist who says one thing, renounces it immediately, claims the credit for the underlying metphor of his alleged comments(while claiming vociferously that he meant no such thing) and then finally goes out there to say it again!
The ensuing chaos is managed effectively by suggesting that he never meant to typecast a community, he’s actually planning on being selective in arson!
The message has been delivered, the valorous poet is here, he’s got the dagger this time, the law be damned. Be scared, very scared.
It’s all a bit silly and very much of the brand of ‘politics’ that we’ve sadly come to terms with. The standard operating procedure now is to ignore such rants and move on - ’Its OK, the guy wants his votes, and the OB vans outside his house, let him have them.’
To this day I have nothing to say to the half-wit for his diabolical outburst. I am, however, shocked at a friend’s hero worship of this unfortunate politician. “Hail Varun Gandhi!” she says, I respect her emotions and the right she enjoys by virtue of our constitution to express her views, but before the public veneration, I’d like her to consider these -
- Does she believe that our knight-in-shining-armour even cares for the cause he claims to espouse?
- Does she believe her hero digs social propriety: is it now acceptable to threaten to maim because it may work at the polls?
- How did she react when her hero went back and attributed the ugliest bits of his tirade to a skilled voice-over or nifty editing?
- Does she consider these ‘alleged’ remarks constructive or destructive?
- If there was point that the hero wanted to make, what was it? What does he want to do and what does he want others to do? How can you possibly think this guy is sincere and he’s going to follow up on what he is ‘alledged’ to have said(a famous lineage of contempt for the law, notwithstanding)? If there’s a new social reality, I don’t get it!
I suggest we cut our hero some slack, let’s not burden him with all these expectations. He’s all of 29 and probably hasn’t seen much of our country beyond his cosy house in Delhi’s Maharani Bagh. A few ideas on how things may turn out -
- He may eventually go the way of his great-grandfather, Jawaharlal. He may evolve into a balanced ‘politician’ and a legendary statesman (much of his present circuitry would have to be rewired, but its possible! Crazier things have happened!)
- He may go down his current path, get very lucky, catch a populist-hatred-traction tailwind and become some sort of a minister somewhere. He might, in the process, be called upon to demonstrate field knowledge of system assisted genocide. His exploits might never match the highs of Gujarat, but he’ll give it a shot anyway, he will get better at it, given time.
- He may continue to drift down his present trajectory, win or lose a bunch of elections but he won’t eventually have an impact on the demographic mix of our country( he would have failed as a defender of his faith, and as the ethnic-cleansing superhero that he so wants to be! ). Condemned to being the the dolt son of a famous father, he will however, register a significant spike on the I-am-a-nutcase scale.
To my friend: If she choses to continue her hero worship, I’d still love her the same. I’d however, like her to be original in her salutes, normal cognition makes me associate the ‘hail’ word with another famous blowhard warmonger for whom things didn’t turn out so well!
About me? I’m not impressed, not scared.
Back to pure semantics, Varun should be fine; this is ‘politics’ has come to, and he seems to be on the button. And that is just unfortunate!
Who is your hero?
by faraz on March 25, 2009
Disclaimer: I’m going to break a ground rule even before I’ve committed to a formal blog-constitution. Just this time, I will talk about politics
defined as: ‘Social relations involving intrigue to gain authority or power’
A 29 year old poet politican has been in the news lately. By definition, he would seem like a keen student of his chosen profession except that he’s not.
He’s an opportunist who says one thing, renounces it immediately, claims the credit for the underlying metphor of his alleged comments(while claiming vociferously that he meant no such thing) and then finally goes out there to say it again!
The ensuing chaos is managed effectively by suggesting that he never meant to typecast a community, he’s actually planning on being selective in arson!
The message has been delivered, the valorous poet is here, he’s got the dagger this time, the law be damned. Be scared, very scared.
It’s all a bit silly and very much of the brand of ‘politics’ that we’ve sadly come to terms with. The standard operating procedure now is to ignore such rants and move on - ’Its OK, the guy wants his votes, and the OB vans outside his house, let him have them.’
To this day I have nothing to say to the half-wit for his diabolical outburst. I am, however, shocked at a friend’s hero worship of this unfortunate politician. “Hail Varun Gandhi!” she says, I respect her emotions and the right she enjoys by virtue of our constitution to express her views, but before the public veneration, I’d like her to consider these -
I suggest we cut our hero some slack, let’s not burden him with all these expectations. He’s all of 29 and probably hasn’t seen much of our country beyond his cosy house in Delhi’s Maharani Bagh. A few ideas on how things may turn out -
To my friend: If she choses to continue her hero worship, I’d still love her the same. I’d however, like her to be original in her salutes, normal cognition makes me associate the ‘hail’ word with another famous blowhard warmonger for whom things didn’t turn out so well!
About me? I’m not impressed, not scared.
Back to pure semantics, Varun should be fine; this is ‘politics’ has come to, and he seems to be on the button. And that is just unfortunate!
{ Comments on this entry are closed }